Type-safe printf from parsing GHC TypeLits Symbol.

An extensible and type-safe printf from parsing GHC TypeLits Symbol literals, matching the semantics of P.printf from Text.Printf in base. The difference is that the variants here will always fail to compile if given arguments of the wrong type (or too many or too little arguments). Most of the variants also provide useful type feedback, telling you the type of arguments it expects and how many when queried with :t or with typed holes.

See README and documentation of GHC.TypeLits.Printf for more information

symbols-printf

(Heavily inspired by Data.Symbol.Examples.Printf)

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62 "Luigi"
You have 3.62 dollars, Luigi

An extensible and type-safe printf from parsing GHC TypeLits Symbol literals, matching the semantics of Text.Printf in base. The difference is that your printfs will always fail to compile if given arguments of the wrong type (or too many or too little arguments). It also allows you to use types to help your development, by telling you the type of arguments it expects and how many when queried with :t or with typed holes.

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62 "Luigi"
You have 3.62 dollars, Luigi

Looking at its type:

ghci> :t printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s"
(FormatType "f" arg1, FormatType "s" arg2)
  => arg1 -> arg2 -> String

It tells you that the result is an arg1 -> arg2 -> String: take two arguments, and return a String. The first argument must be an instance of FormatType "f" (things that can be formatted by %f) and the second argument must be an instance of FormatType "s" (things that can be formatted by %s).

We can see this in action by progressively applying arguments:

ghci> :t printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62
FormatType "s" arg1 => arg1 -> String

ghci> :t printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62 "Luigi"
String

The type errors for forgetting to apply an argument (or applying too many arguments) are pretty clear:

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s"
-- ERROR: Call to printf missing argument fulfilling "%.2f"
-- Either provide an argument or rewrite the format string to not expect
-- one.

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62
-- ERROR: Call to printf missing argument fulfilling "%s"
-- Either provide an argument or rewrite the format string to not expect
-- one.

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62 "Luigi"
You have 3.62 dollars, Luigi

ghci> putStrLn $ printf @"You have %.2f dollars, %s" 3.62 "Luigi" 72
-- ERROR: An extra argument of type Integer was given to a call to printf
-- Either remove the argument, or rewrite the format string to include the
-- appropriate hole.

You can extend functionality with formatting for your own types by providing instances of FormatType.

Caveats

For medium-length or long strings, the parsing can be fairly slow and cause slow compile times. This might be due to the underlying mechanism that the symbols package exploits...or just GHC performance issues in general.

Moving to typechecker plugin based parsing does improve performance ... however, I'm not sure how to get around requiring every module using printf to require enabling the typechecker plugin, which isn't too great from a usability standpoint. Template Haskell based alternatives (like th-printf) already do require an extra pragma (for QuasiQuotes), though so it might not be too bad in comparison.

Comparisons

There are a few other options for type-safe printfs out on hackage, and they all differ in a few key ways. Some, like th-printf and safe-printf, offer Template Haskell-based ways to generate your printf functions. This package is intended as a "template-haskell free" alternative. However, it is notable that with a Template-Haskell based approach, we can solve the "pick two" situation above: th-printf's printf fulfills all three requirements in the table above, with the only potential drawback being Template Haskell usage.

Some others, like safe-printf, formatting, printf-safe, xformat, and category-printf, require manually constructing your fomatters, and so you always need to duplicate double-quotes for string literals. This detracts from one of the main convenience aspects of printf, in my opinion.

"You have " % f' 2 % " dollars, " % s
-- vs
"You have %.2f dollars, %s"

However, calling these libraries "safe printf libraries" does not do them justice. A library like formatting is a feature-rich formatting library, handling things like dates and other useful formatting features in a first-class way that embraces Haskell idioms. This library here is merely a type-safe printf, emulating the features of base's printf and C printf(3).

Todo

• Make faster
• Tests
• Support for localization/dynamic strings. Should be possible, but we'd have to re-implement a subset of singletons.